• About US
  • Terms of use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising guide
No Result
View All Result
BBG Architecture Life
  • Architecture
  • Design
  • Interiors
  • Technology
  • Trends
  • Projects
  • Collections
  • Education
  • House
  • Restaurant
  • Greenhouse
  • Hotel
BBG Architecture Life
  • Interiors

    Miami Beach residence by SAOTA takes indoor-outdoor living to the extreme

    Vision unveiled for London school powered by Thames tide

    Erasmus exchange programme could remain open to UK students after Brexit

    Sou Fujimoto creates ornate bookshelves for Basel installation

    Frank Lloyd Wright merged eastern and western architecture at Tokyo’s Imperial Hotel

    Drone footage captures brutalist Robin Hood Gardens ahead of imminent demolition

    Dan Brunn renovates Frank Gehry-designed LA house for an illustrator

  • Design
    Screen Shot 2019-10-14 at 8.49.03 AM

    The Design Spark 2019 Product Showcase Set to Show Innovations Around Independent Living | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Ho (left) and Chang sharing EcoWorld’s future plans at the Eco Sanctuary Gallery. (Photos by Low Yen Yeing/EdgeProp.my)

    Malaysia: Universal Design for EcoWorld’s Future Projects | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    A computer model of one of the accessible homes.

    How Gaming Technology is Helping Design More Accessible Homes | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    New Universal Design Guide Aims to make Public Spaces Pleasant for All | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    New Universal Design Guide Aims to make Public Spaces Pleasant for All | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    University Students Design Wheelchair Hand Warmer for Persons with Muscular Dystrophy | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    University Students Design Wheelchair Hand Warmer for Persons with Muscular Dystrophy | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    The Home Innovation Challenge

    UK-based Design Council Focuses on Accessible Home Innovation   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Private Transport Provider to Offer an Inclusive Experience in Malta   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Autonomous Vehicle Design Should Benefit Broader Group of Potential Drivers   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Ikea to Use 3-D Printing to Make Furniture More Accessible for Persons with Disabilities   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Ikea to Use 3-D Printing to Make Furniture More Accessible for Persons with Disabilities   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Toyota Improves Universal Design Taxicab for Quicker Wheelchair Access   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Toyota Improves Universal Design Taxicab for Quicker Wheelchair Access   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

  • Technology
    Dahua USA Releases New LincX2PRO Line Linking Homes with Professional Systems – Dahua Technology USA Inc | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Dahua USA Releases New LincX2PRO Line Linking Homes with Professional Systems – Dahua Technology USA Inc | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Dahua Helps Retail Operations Run Smoothly – Dahua Technology USA Inc | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    two people seated on a table and signing agreements Two people standing behind them on a stage.

    Mada Assistive Technology Centre Signs MoU with Korea Trade Promotion Agency | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    A computer model of one of the accessible homes.

    How Gaming Technology is Helping Design More Accessible Homes | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Government of Canada Announces New Accessible Technology Program Funding Recipients | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Dahua Technology USA Announces Product Lineup for GSX 2019 – Dahua North America | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Dahua Technology Partners with Pepper to Bring Heightened Security to Its Video IoT Devices – Dahua North America | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Dahua Technology Partners with Pepper to Bring Heightened Security to Its Video IoT Devices – Dahua North America | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    India: Assistive Technology for All 2030 Conference Focuses in Infrastructure, Assistive Devices | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    India: Assistive Technology for All 2030 Conference Focuses in Infrastructure, Assistive Devices | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Private Transport Provider to Offer an Inclusive Experience in Malta   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    National Federation of the Blind Applauds Introduction of Greater Access and Independence through Nonvisual Access Technology (GAIN) Act | Best Brothers Group of Companies

  • Projects
    Ho (left) and Chang sharing EcoWorld’s future plans at the Eco Sanctuary Gallery. (Photos by Low Yen Yeing/EdgeProp.my)

    Malaysia: Universal Design for EcoWorld’s Future Projects | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    European Commission Provides 20 Cities with Funding for Innovative Projects on Inclusion  | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    European Commission Provides 20 Cities with Funding for Innovative Projects on Inclusion  | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    The Portland Art & Learning Studio Encourages Diverse Projects by Artists with Disabilities | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    The Portland Art & Learning Studio Encourages Diverse Projects by Artists with Disabilities | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Yoocan Seeks Collaborative Partners, Highlights Projects at Naidex 2019   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Yoocan Seeks Collaborative Partners, Highlights Projects at Naidex 2019   | Best Brothers Group of Companies

    Vision unveiled for London school powered by Thames tide

    Climate change forces emergency repairs to “failsafe” Arctic seed vault

    Grenfell Tower fire deaths raise questions about safety of post-war renovations

    Santiago Calatrava’s World Trade Center Oculus continues to leak

    Note Design and Afteroom hack IKEA kitchens to make living room furnishings for Reform

No Result
View All Result
BBG Architecture Life
No Result
View All Result
Home BBG

Customization vs. Configuration: Which Approach Is Best?

Admin by Admin
November 1, 2019
in BBG
0 0
0
Customization vs. Configuration: Which Approach Is Best?
334
SHARES
2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Google Share on Linkedin
Customization vs. Configuration: Which Approach Is Best?


By Scott Reedy, Senior Director of Marketing, Arena Solutions


Software vendors have always sought to provide highly adaptable solutions by allowing customization. Most vendors will claim that it’s easy to customize their solution. However, there are two different approaches. One approach involves the need to program or code (customization) and the other involves using a simple user interface that non-programmers can set up (configuration).


While custom coding offers the promise of doing virtually anything you may want to do, within reason, it typically comes with a high cost. Customers have to employ either large IT teams or many outside consultants to change the application whenever business requirements change. And, many times the application is so “customizable” that you can’t make the software do much of anything without lots of coding. This coding-heavy approach leads to scope creep, long implementations, and broken budgets. 


With today’s plethora of cloud solutions and mobile apps, most of us want the ability to configure quickly and easily without having to know how to code. When evaluating new solutions, it’s important to ask software vendors to demonstrate how to configure the application so you can determine the level of effort and technical expertise required to do so.


 


Configurable Solutions Have Lower Total Cost of Ownership


Applications designed to allow easy configuration via an intuitive user interface provide the ability to add or change users, security privileges, approval routings, fields, page layouts, and more. Truly configurable applications are always fully supported whenever new versions are released. This means that software vendors have reviewed backward compatibility to ensure past and future functionality with the ability to configure without breaking how the application or any integrations work.


For solutions with a code-based approach to customization, it’s very different. Each customer may have customized the application in such a way that the vendor cannot guarantee compatibility for new versions (or at least not without significant additional consulting and coding). Many times, customers become rev-locked on an existing version because the level of effort to bring the customization forward with the new release is too high, impossible, or deemed to be risky.


From a financial perspective, configurable solutions cost less to implement and deploy than customized ones. Companies must take into account the total cost of ownership when evaluating the initial implementation of software, the ability to upgrade future releases, and the effort required to maintain the solution with in-house IT or external consulting resources. With this in mind, it’s wise to consider the entire cost-benefit analysis to determine the total cost of ownership.


Aside from comparing the software subscription, initial implementation, and ongoing cost to maintain the system, buyers should strive to talk with several customer references to understand the level of effort required to modify and maintain both types of applications. Surface-level questions about customization won’t do the job, either. Prospects need to ask detailed questions about setting up users, fields, screens, routings, security, and external access. Detailed questions will help you understand the implications and benefits of using each system.


 


Scalability and Ease of Administration


One common fallacy about configuration and customization is that customization offers greater scalability. With modern cloud-based software, solutions were designed to be configured by just about anyone while also being able to scale from small to large global enterprises. With minimal training on the use of the administration of configurable solutions, users can quickly learn how to configure their software to meet their specific business needs. 


Solutions that must be customized via coding require more technical resources to modify the system and maintain it whenever business processes demand changes. With configurable solutions, the software provider develops with ease of administration in mind. The administration user interface is designed in a straight-forward manner with built-in drop-down menus, pick lists, and field attribute options.


Some would argue that customizable solutions offer greater flexibility in regard to integration as well. However, configurable solutions are often easier to integrate, especially if the software provider offers application programming interfaces (APIs). With standard APIs, customers could write their own integrations, but more often, software vendors create an ecosystem of partners willing to create API-based integrations to upstream or downstream systems like enterprise resource planning (ERP), computer-aided design (CAD), and customer relationship management (CRM) systems. So, configurable solutions with APIs offer the simplest and easiest way to support business processes that span more than a single system. And, the use of APIs ensures that future releases will be designed so integrations will work as the primary software solution evolves. With a customized solution, there is no guarantee that the solution will easily upgrade or that integrations based on customized code will work going forward.


 


Purpose-Built Cloud Solutions Offer Flexibility


Both on-premises and cloud-based solutions can offer customizable or configurable approaches. But true multi-tenant cloud solutions offer shared infrastructure to scale and provide lower costs. These multi-tenant solutions are architected from the ground up to maximize the consumer experience and ensure easy upgrades and greater scalability with configuration built into the model. This is the only way multi-tenant cloud solutions can guarantee that every customer can upgrade automatically every time the cloud vendor pushes out a new release. Every customer comes along for the ride with nobody left behind or stuck on older revisions due to customized code conflicts.


The “cloud train” left the station long ago and more than 80 percent of companies will rely on cloud solutions by 2020, according to LogicMonitor. On the other hand, on-premises solutions are projected to decrease by 10 percent and will account for only 27 percent of all workloads by 2020.


 


Which Approach Is Best?


For companies that want to move fast, collaborate with large distributed teams, and own their own destiny as business processes evolve rapidly, configuration provides the best option to meet business requirements, control costs, and ensure long-term viability of software solutions. There will always be a few “nirvana naysayers” who tout the need to customize applications to meet every customer-specific business process. But the cost, time, and risk associated with the custom-coded approach is too high for today’s modern, lean enterprises that want the ability to control their own path without relying on custom code, expensive technical resources, or risky science projects.

Did you Enjoy this Article?

Check out our free e-newsletters
to read more great articles.

Subscribe Now

Customization vs. Configuration: Which Approach Is Best?


By Scott Reedy, Senior Director of Marketing, Arena Solutions


Software vendors have always sought to provide highly adaptable solutions by allowing customization. Most vendors will claim that it’s easy to customize their solution. However, there are two different approaches. One approach involves the need to program or code (customization) and the other involves using a simple user interface that non-programmers can set up (configuration).


While custom coding offers the promise of doing virtually anything you may want to do, within reason, it typically comes with a high cost. Customers have to employ either large IT teams or many outside consultants to change the application whenever business requirements change. And, many times the application is so “customizable” that you can’t make the software do much of anything without lots of coding. This coding-heavy approach leads to scope creep, long implementations, and broken budgets. 


With today’s plethora of cloud solutions and mobile apps, most of us want the ability to configure quickly and easily without having to know how to code. When evaluating new solutions, it’s important to ask software vendors to demonstrate how to configure the application so you can determine the level of effort and technical expertise required to do so.


 


Configurable Solutions Have Lower Total Cost of Ownership


Applications designed to allow easy configuration via an intuitive user interface provide the ability to add or change users, security privileges, approval routings, fields, page layouts, and more. Truly configurable applications are always fully supported whenever new versions are released. This means that software vendors have reviewed backward compatibility to ensure past and future functionality with the ability to configure without breaking how the application or any integrations work.


For solutions with a code-based approach to customization, it’s very different. Each customer may have customized the application in such a way that the vendor cannot guarantee compatibility for new versions (or at least not without significant additional consulting and coding). Many times, customers become rev-locked on an existing version because the level of effort to bring the customization forward with the new release is too high, impossible, or deemed to be risky.


From a financial perspective, configurable solutions cost less to implement and deploy than customized ones. Companies must take into account the total cost of ownership when evaluating the initial implementation of software, the ability to upgrade future releases, and the effort required to maintain the solution with in-house IT or external consulting resources. With this in mind, it’s wise to consider the entire cost-benefit analysis to determine the total cost of ownership.


Aside from comparing the software subscription, initial implementation, and ongoing cost to maintain the system, buyers should strive to talk with several customer references to understand the level of effort required to modify and maintain both types of applications. Surface-level questions about customization won’t do the job, either. Prospects need to ask detailed questions about setting up users, fields, screens, routings, security, and external access. Detailed questions will help you understand the implications and benefits of using each system.


 


Scalability and Ease of Administration


One common fallacy about configuration and customization is that customization offers greater scalability. With modern cloud-based software, solutions were designed to be configured by just about anyone while also being able to scale from small to large global enterprises. With minimal training on the use of the administration of configurable solutions, users can quickly learn how to configure their software to meet their specific business needs. 


Solutions that must be customized via coding require more technical resources to modify the system and maintain it whenever business processes demand changes. With configurable solutions, the software provider develops with ease of administration in mind. The administration user interface is designed in a straight-forward manner with built-in drop-down menus, pick lists, and field attribute options.


Some would argue that customizable solutions offer greater flexibility in regard to integration as well. However, configurable solutions are often easier to integrate, especially if the software provider offers application programming interfaces (APIs). With standard APIs, customers could write their own integrations, but more often, software vendors create an ecosystem of partners willing to create API-based integrations to upstream or downstream systems like enterprise resource planning (ERP), computer-aided design (CAD), and customer relationship management (CRM) systems. So, configurable solutions with APIs offer the simplest and easiest way to support business processes that span more than a single system. And, the use of APIs ensures that future releases will be designed so integrations will work as the primary software solution evolves. With a customized solution, there is no guarantee that the solution will easily upgrade or that integrations based on customized code will work going forward.


 


Purpose-Built Cloud Solutions Offer Flexibility


Both on-premises and cloud-based solutions can offer customizable or configurable approaches. But true multi-tenant cloud solutions offer shared infrastructure to scale and provide lower costs. These multi-tenant solutions are architected from the ground up to maximize the consumer experience and ensure easy upgrades and greater scalability with configuration built into the model. This is the only way multi-tenant cloud solutions can guarantee that every customer can upgrade automatically every time the cloud vendor pushes out a new release. Every customer comes along for the ride with nobody left behind or stuck on older revisions due to customized code conflicts.


The “cloud train” left the station long ago and more than 80 percent of companies will rely on cloud solutions by 2020, according to LogicMonitor. On the other hand, on-premises solutions are projected to decrease by 10 percent and will account for only 27 percent of all workloads by 2020.


 


Which Approach Is Best?


For companies that want to move fast, collaborate with large distributed teams, and own their own destiny as business processes evolve rapidly, configuration provides the best option to meet business requirements, control costs, and ensure long-term viability of software solutions. There will always be a few “nirvana naysayers” who tout the need to customize applications to meet every customer-specific business process. But the cost, time, and risk associated with the custom-coded approach is too high for today’s modern, lean enterprises that want the ability to control their own path without relying on custom code, expensive technical resources, or risky science projects.

Did you Enjoy this Article?

Check out our free e-newsletters
to read more great articles.

Subscribe Now

© 2019, Best Brothers Group. All rights reserved.

Tags: ApproachconfigurationCustomization
Admin

Admin

Canada 🇨🇦

0
Confirmed
0
Deaths
0
Recovered

Stay Connected

  • 1.4k Fan
  • 3 Follower
  • 35 Follower
  • 131 Follower

Popular Post

    Follow Our Page


    For all queries regarding print editions of BBG Architecture Life, including change of address, change of payment details requests and back issues, please contact +1-888-224-8688. Email: [email protected]
    • About US
    • Terms of use
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertising guide

    Recent News

    Accessibility advocates say Peggy’s Cove viewing deck will ensure safe access for all - Halifax

    Accessibility advocates say Peggy’s Cove viewing deck will ensure safe access for all – Halifax

    January 24, 2021
    • Best Brothers Group
    • BBG Security Cameras
    • BBG Hub Home Automation
    • BBG Renovations
    • BBG Construction
    • BBG Business Partnership
    • BBG I/O Marketing
    • Security Cameras GK
    • Automatic Door Depot
    • About US
    • Terms of use
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertising guide

    © 2018 BBG Architecture Life - supports the architecture industry on a daily news by Best Brothers Group.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Interiors
    • Design
    • Technology
    • Projects

    © 2018 BBG Architecture Life - supports the architecture industry on a daily news by Best Brothers Group.

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Fill the forms bellow to register

    All fields are required. Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In